Dialogic Tarot

Dialogic Tarot

Dialogic Tarot School, w15

The Chariot and the Soul: Plato’s Psychology of Inner Conflict

Rita Rottelbac, PhD's avatar
Rita Rottelbac, PhD
Apr 27, 2026
∙ Paid

Plato gives us one of the most enduring images of the human psyche: a chariot pulled by two horses, driven by a charioteer who is trying—often desperately—to keep them moving in the same direction.

It appears in the dialogue Phaedrus, where Socrates, instead of offering a dry definition of love or soul, turns to myth. The result is not a theory in the modern sense, but a living diagram of inner experience….And it still works today.

The structure of the soul

Socrates describes the soul as a winged chariot:

  • A charioteer (reason)

  • Two horses (competing drives)

  • A struggle over direction, balance, and ascent

The charioteer is not a ruler in the modern authoritarian sense. He is more like an anxious intelligence—trying to see clearly while everything he depends on is moving.

The horses are not “good” and “evil” in a simplistic moral sense. They are forces with different orientations.

The two horses

The white, noble horse: order, dignity, aspiration

One horse is disciplined, responsive, and capable of shame and honor. It wants alignment. It responds to training. It can be led upward.

This is the part of us that wants coherence:

  • to become better

  • to act meaningfully

  • to live in alignment with something higher than impulse

It is not free of desire—but it is shaped desire.

The black, unruly horse: appetite, impulse, resistance

The other horse resists guidance. It pulls toward immediacy: pleasure, gratification, avoidance of restraint.

It is not “evil” so much as unintegrated energy—raw motion without reflection.

It does not ask “is this meaningful?”
It asks “do I want it now?”

The charioteer’s problem

The most important figure is not either horse—it is the charioteer. Reason in Plato is not omnipotent but outnumbered…

It must:

  • interpret signals

  • anticipate resistance

  • hold direction under pressure

  • prevent collapse into fragmentation

This is why the metaphor still feels psychologically accurate. Conscious intention may be sovereign but it feels managerial….Constantly negotiating with forces it does not fully control. Socrates’ metaphor depicts the soul not as simple unity, but as a complex system of tensions.

Why the chariot moves upward—or doesn’t

In Socrates’ myth, the chariot is capable of ascending toward truth and divine reality. But this depends entirely on coordination.

When the horses are aligned, the soul rises.

When they fight, the chariot stalls or crashes.

In his view, ascension or descent are not a form of moral punishment…They are a structural consequence of how the soul is built.

The soul does not “fail” because it is inherently bad.
It may descend to lower frequencies because forces are pulling in incompatible directions at the same time, and the charioteer loses full control.

A tarot reflection: The Chariot

It is difficult not to hear echoes of this in the tarot card The Chariot.

Where Plato gives us metaphysics, tarot gives us symbolic psychology. Both describe movement under tension.

In tarot terms, The Chariot is not about smooth control—it is about:

  • holding opposites without collapsing into either

  • steering through contradiction

  • maintaining direction while internally divided

Reading the myth today

If we translate Socrates into modern language, the chariot might look like this:

  • The charioteer = executive function, reflective awareness, decision-making

  • The noble horse = values, long-term orientation, integrity

  • The unruly horse = impulse systems, avoidance, desire, fear, craving

The struggle is to train relationship between the two horses, and subject them to the will of consciousness.

A soul without the unruly horse would have no drive.
A soul without the noble horse would have no direction.
And a soul without the charioteer would have no coherence.

The deeper point

Plato is not describing a flaw in human nature.

He is describing the condition of consciousness itself:
to be aware is to be divided; to act is to negotiate that division.

The question the Chariot poses hence becomes:

Who is holding the reins—and how often do they remember they are not alone in the chariot?

This Week in Dialogic Tarot School

Download the workbook below and email me your findings and reflections at ritarottelbac@gmail.com

Looking forward to receiving your work.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Rita Rottelbac, PhD.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Rita Rottelbac · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture